Sacramento Daily Union, Volume 10, Number 1521, 9 February 1856 — THE COURTS. [ARTICLE]

THE COURTS.

Supreme Court— Mdmhay,O. J.Terey, J. Tikksdav, Feb. 7. Samuel F. Reynolds admitted as an attorney and counsellor. \ Application of S. Hamilton for lice-use to practice referred to examining committee. Thorne vs. California Stage Co. — Submitted on briefs, to be tiled in ten days. Gunu vs. Bates & McCarty. — Argued and submitted. Billings vs. Harvey it O.L— Argued and submitted, with leave t.i file briefs in live days. Robb vs. Robb. — Argued and submitted. Ilobb vs. Randall. — On motion of L. Sanders, jr., suggesting diminution of record, certiorari ordered, returnable Tuesday, L2th in a t. ilerrill vs. Gorham. — Argued in part. Charles E. Judah admitted us an attorney and counsellor. Friday, Feb. 8, 1856. Present, Heydenfeldt, J., Terry, J. Edward Pollock admitted as an Attorney and Counsellor on favorable report of Examining Committee. Grotscben vs. Page et aL— Oa motion and stipulation cause placed on Term Calendar, and submitted on briefs to be Sled in 10 days. Davidson vs. Gorbam — On motion and stipulation time for filing briefs extended to kith iaat. Cook VS. Brown — Placed on Term Calendar and submitted on briefs to be tiled in IS days. Rhodes et al. vs. Jlincklej* Continued, with leave to submit. Merrill vs. Gorham— Argument concluded aud cause submitted. Adjourned till to-morrow. District Court — A. C. Mossox, Judge. Friday, Feb. S. Israel k Carlisle vs. A. D. Patterson— Sent to Clerk's office. Norman vs. Pearson— D smissed at plaintiff's :ost. Borradaile vs. Borradaile Dismissed at plainifTscost. Wadieigh ts. Brown— Dismissed at plaintiff's :ost. Bachelor vs. Hawser et al. — Referred by consent o Maj or Bowie, to report on all questions of law md fact. Rivett & Co. vs. L. W. Hastings— Referred to C. W. Wallace to report on all questions of law and act. California Steam Navigation Co. vs. steamer Defender—Dismissed. G. W. Moore vs. Lockett— Ordered that further >ill of particular!", giving items, be furnished in ive days. Luce et al. vs. Burgess — Referred to N. R. Wil- I ■in for computation — decree to be entered accordugly. Keables vs. Ashmun — Death of plaintiff suggested, au<i suit revived in name of John Smith, Keen tor. Coehran vs. Miller — Report of Referee confirm* id. Judgment for plaintiff rendered, and Receiver ordered to sell property. Kohn et al. vs. Brock— Order of publication of ummous. Strong vs. Uiller— Application for appointment if receiver, argued and submitted. Bradley vs. White— Motion to strike out answer nstaioea, and defendant allowed to file verified I nswer in live days. Tuttle vs. Mouiford — Demurrer to complaint ar- i gued and submitted. John Smith, executor, vs. Win. B. KeablesDemurer to complaint argued and submitted. Wm. Knapmayer, a native of Hanover, admitted >> citizenship. Adjourned till 10J^ o'clock a. si. on Friday next. District Court Calendar. FEUKUAUV TKKM. Feb. 18. — Presley Dunlnp, administrator, vs. I Jrainard; J. P. ll«nnerich vs. D. N. Muni; G. J. 'helaa vs. Frank Harney. Feb. 19. — Prosser Si Torton vs. Barker A Hodgen; M. W. Martin vs. R. B. Berry; John 11. Bram- j lall vs. Willis Coplau et al.; Presley Duula}> vs. P. I. French et al. Feb. 20. — Samuel Snow vs. Henry Moss; <■. W. I lift vs. W. S. White et al ; I). N. Hunt vs. 11. E. lobinson et al.: Henry Malcome vs. 11. Kennedy; ohn Cumin vs. Lelia Cannin. Feu. — J. P. Bathelor vs. his creditors; Win. ! ]. Brooks vs. Green Wildes; Saml. Cross vs. S. W. i IcAbee; ('has. 11. Simmons vs. Wm. C. Crossett; | V. W. Brown vs. W. B. Cahoon. Fkj:. 20.— W. H. Prindle vs. S. J. May et al.; lenry Dalrymple vs. A. C. Peachy et al.; llurlbert j t McDonald vs. Long & Hunter; Hazzard Webster s. Bryant & Davis; Sacramento County vs. Rhodes t Maddux. Feb. 27. R. W. Cirr vs. Andrew Kelly, adminstrator; James Moore vs. Edward I*. Fig© Monague .\. Co. vs. A. C. Peters; Matthew Borland vs. I. W. Paul. Feb. 28.— Isbam Metcalf vs. Alex. Brazelton; S. I . VMeFarlan vs. W. B. White; Brackett & Keyes •s. steamer Meda; L. V. H. Howell vs. J. B. Starr; '\/a<. McKillip vs. Jesse Cox. MarciiS. — J. P. Hardy vs. Robert Miller et al.; 'eter Shaver et al. vs. Robert Milles et al.; W. B. Wilson vs. Joseph Porter; Win. 11. Holbrook vs. steamboat Meda; John D. Grant vs. G. W. Coffee. March 4. — H. E. Robinson, administrator, vs. taker ft Hamilton; Wendell Keath vs. J. Houck; 3aml. N< iris vs. Farmer & Bailey; H.O. Beattyvs. 'hristie & Lewis; I. i S. Wormser vs. J. G. Brewon. March 5. — 11. Slingerland vs. 11. Perkins; Sacranento Turnpike and Plank Road Co. vs. Pearson, Taylor A Carr; C. R. & S. S. Barnes vs. Wm. S. White; - Chamberlain vs. J. W. Bell; H. K. lobinson vs. A. P. Smith et al. Makch William Bradley vs. Wm. S. White; Crocker & Crocker vs. Albert Saul et al.; Price 'roctor vs. County of Sacramento; Samuel Xorris i- Wm. Muldrow et al.; Bristol vs. Henderson & [enderson. March 17.— Simpson vs. Denison & Clark; A. G. Jarre vs. C. P. Nichols; A. J. Jenning et al. vs. M. I. Ladd: Stansbury vs. Covey & Ross. March 27.— 11. A. Caulfield vs. M. J. Yallejo. Branch Mint. — From the Evening Neva we earn that daring the past month, the gold deposted for assay and coinage amounted to 97,500,45 ranees, and the whole amount coined was $98 1,000 n gold, and $28,000 in silver. The amount of I jars unparted; gold $29,488 45, silver |23,609 45, giving a total coinage of $1,065,091 00. More Recruits. — One huudred of the passengers who left on the last Nicaragua steamer were sound to Nicaragua and no further.

For XtCi.aAi.rA. — Capt. John A. Clark left on the steamer Carte* for Nicaragua. The Zbsm Talk understand:* Capt. Clark has received the appointment of Major General in the Xew Granadian annv, and is expected to succeed General Walker, who leaves on a visit to Europe, for the ' purpose of having the present Government i acknowledged by the European powers. Tradk in San Francisco. — Negotiations, says the Eraiintj Newt, of Tursdav, which have been , in progress several days, have resulted this morning iv the sale of t«vo or three parcels of domestic flour. The figures show a slight improvement on , previous quotations. Wheat continues dull, with a good deal offering. Barley and oaus are firm, i There has been a good demand for China rice.